<Discontinuité> in the Bergsonian notion of <durée> : Paradoxically after bachelard

ベルクソン的「持続」における「不連続性」の契機 : バシュラールによる批判を逆説的な導きとして

<Discontinuité> in the Bergsonian notion of <durée> : Paradoxically after bachelard

In this paper I will consider <discontinuité> as a positive element of the Bergsonian notion of <durée>.
Since his maiden book, Time and Free Will (1889), Henri Bergson (1859-1941) defines time as <durée>, which means uninterrupted continuity of the past, the present and the future. In opposition to Bergson, Gaston Bachelard (1884-1962), who begins to speculate on time in the 1930s, takes time to be essentially discontinuous.
According to Bachelard, it is not continuous <durée> but discontinuous <instant> that does give birth to something new, and this is why he criticizes Bergson. In my opinion, however, at least in the 1930s, Bergson himself tries to reconsider <durée> not only to be continuous but also to be discontinuous.

Creators Murakami Ryu