<Rétrospectivité> in the Bergsonian notion of <durée> : After Jankélévitch and Merleau-Ponty
The philosophical studies of Yamaguchi University Volume 30
Page 65-76
published_at 2023-03-23
Title
ベルクソン的「持続」における「回顧性」の契機 : ジャンケレヴィッチ、メルロ=ポンティを手がかりに
<Rétrospectivité> in the Bergsonian notion of <durée> : After Jankélévitch and Merleau-Ponty
Abstract
In this paper I will consider <rétrospectivité> as a positive element of the Bergsonian notion of <durée>.
Around 1930 Henri Bergson borrows from Vladimir Jankélévitch a concept of <illusion de rétrospectivité>, which means a lack of understanding about <durée>. However, his usage of the concept seems not to be true to Jankélévitch’s, in that he regards <rétrospectivité> as a positive element of <durée>.
In my opinion, Bergson’s infidelity to Jankélévitch, so to speak, is based on his interest in <histoire>, as far as the mysticism is concerned, which bears fruit in The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (1932). As regards this, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, who criticizes Bergson for his misunderstanding <histoire>, provides an important clue.
Around 1930 Henri Bergson borrows from Vladimir Jankélévitch a concept of <illusion de rétrospectivité>, which means a lack of understanding about <durée>. However, his usage of the concept seems not to be true to Jankélévitch’s, in that he regards <rétrospectivité> as a positive element of <durée>.
In my opinion, Bergson’s infidelity to Jankélévitch, so to speak, is based on his interest in <histoire>, as far as the mysticism is concerned, which bears fruit in The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (1932). As regards this, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, who criticizes Bergson for his misunderstanding <histoire>, provides an important clue.
Source Identifiers
[PISSN] 0919-357X
Languages
jpn
Resource Type
departmental bulletin paper
Publishers
山口大学哲学研究会
Date Issued
2023-03-23
File Version
Version of Record
Access Rights
open access